- Is more scalable, requiring very little or no human intervention to provision new users of the service, and allowing the service to grow to hundreds or thousands of distinct customers, including individuals.
- Is designed for use at an enterprise scale, including capabilities such as integration with CalNet authentication/authorization, delegated administration and group management, etc.
- Is based on open and fully documented standards for metadata storage and preservation
- Is based on FLOSS software, that does not require an end user to purchase client software in order to take full advantage of the service.
- More easily integrates with other services, such as ARTStor, bSpace, the Library, cloud-based services (e.g. Flickr, YouTube, Scribd, etc.), institutional and discipline-specific repositories, etc.
• Developed a literature review of current thinking about digital asset management and digital repository systems (see http://mvp-drm.berkeley.edu/wiki/Related_Literature_and_Other_Resources)
• Initial exploration and investigation of platform and service possibilities, including the possibilities ranging from:
- mashing together services from local and cloud providers to provide many or most of the necessary capabilities of an MVP system, to:
- systems such as Nuxeo, Alfresco, Thalia, ePrints, dSpace, etc. which would be run and managed in-house.
We believe the final solution will likely be a blend or middle ground on this spectrum.
• Hired Noah Wittman as Program Manager.
• Added Ian Crew to the team on a permanent basis. (He has been a part of the team on a temporary basis since October 2008.) Ian is responsible for managing the running of the platform and services for the Media Vault.
• Added Rick Jaffe to the team on a permanent basis. Rick is currently participating in community and customer outreach, and in planning for the next-generation Media Vault platform
Internal Process Improvements
• Created MVP Wiki for planning and project coordination. See http://mvp.berkeley.edu/wiki
• Did extensive work on project planning and deadline/milestone creation and description.
• Implemented Footprints for issue tracking.
Technical Accomplishments
• Implemented full monitoring of MVP services, which actively alert the team to issues with any of the services, and warn of potential issues before they affect service delivery. This has resulted in significantly decreased downtime for the Media Vault service.
• Implemented auditing of UC Backup backups, verifying that backups are complete and correct on an ongoing basis
• Performed a successful recovery test of nearly 2TB of data from UC Backup. All data was recovered successfully and fully intact (matching MD5 checksums on each file).
• Implemented complete backups of all Portfolio metadata databases.
• UC Backup reduced their prices recently, reducing our total storage and backup costs from $0.75/GB/month to $0.65/GB/month ($0.15/GB/month storage, $0.25/GB/month onsite backup, $0.25/GB/month offsite backup). As we are currently using approximately 4TB of storage, this will save $400/month.
• Implemented a significantly improved website, with updated marketing materials.
• Performed outreach, to engage potential customers and to gather further requirements for the MVP Gen 2 platform
• MVP Workshops–we are planning for two workshops for early Fall 2009:
- Service Provider Workshop
• October 2009
• We will work with the service providers whose services inter-relate and coordinate with MVP activities (e.g the Library and ETS) to ensure that everyone’s plans and activities in this area are well coordinated and avoid overlap and duplication of effort.
- MVP Community Workshop
• October 2009
• We will focus on knowledge exchange and developing of the next generation Media Vault platform and services.
Posted by elizabeth